I don’t discuss politics in the family or casual setting too often, mostly because I am so vehemently anti-confrontational. Politics seems to bring out the worst sides of the people that I like to be around, and because of this, and the lack of an easy way to talk about things, I just avoid the situation altogether. Some may call this apathy, and they may be right, but I like to think that I am leaving the table open for all other discussions of interest.
To this end, however, I would like to talk briefly about the candidate for 2008 presidency that I think suits the interests of the country best. His name is Dr. Ron Paul. Because the mainstream media refuses to report much about him (since he doesn’t fit into their profile of presidential material), most people haven’t heard about him, except through the blogosphere and word of mouth. The man is brilliantly honest and dependable, however, and I think that most would agree with me if they took some time to gather the facts about the candidates that they are supporting for Presidential consideration.
Ron Paul has been representing Texas as a House congressman for almost 20 years, and has been an extremely prolific member, putting forth to vote and legislation many smart ideas and plans. Ron Paul once ran for President in 1988 on the Libertarian platform, before joining the Republican party as a congressman shortly thereafter. He ran, as he does now, on the basic premise of returning the country to the design of the framers of the Constitution, and reinstating Liberty, Privacy, and other such basic principles. For those of you who often base your vote on the abortion issue, Ron Paul opposes abortion, but does not support a national abolishment. Like most of his views, he supports the Constitutional idea that nearly all issues should be location dependent, and that the constituent states of the US should be making most of their own decisions on what they want their people to have rights to do and not do.
Ron Paul is not nearly as well funded as some of the other candidates who rely on their personal wealth and corporate connections to propel them into the eye of the public. Especially with a near vacuum of media coverage, Ron Paul has been relying on the vivacity of his followers on the Internet and other such open mediums to plug his campaign and try to get the word out about his excellent positions and ideas for change.
I donated to Ron Paul’s campaign, and I support him for both the Republican nomination and the Presidency. I support him because he stands for change in a way that absolutely no other candidate is even willing to begin to approach. Ron Paul is for immediate ending of the Iraq war, and retooling our foreign policy to be in line with what the founders would have wanted: a more aggressively isolationist approach to letting the world sort out it’s problems. Ron Paul is for changing the economy, and abolishing the Fed and centralized governmental control over the economy. Ron Paul is for reverting to the gold standard, to ensure that our dollar stops plummeting with regards to the rest of the world economy. Ron Paul is for real, actual change, not just saying “I’m for change” and voting the Republican party line, like all of the other candidates, including the Democratic contenders. Ron Paul’s voting record, passion for change, consistency of truth, and adhesion to the founding principles of this nation make him the most attractive candidate for me, and my personal only hope for real change in this country.
Read up on Ron here: RonPaul2008.com